Re: Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation
On 2004-06-22 Anthony Fok <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:51:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok) remove lilypond/2.1.0-2
> > # 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139)
> > # no maintainer reaction
> Please don't remove lilypond... A new packaged was prepared, finished
> building it at 2004-06-18 04:36 +0800,
> and uploaded 2004-06-19 06:27+0800.
> It is currently in the queue waiting for manual overrides AFAIK.
> I splitted the architecture-independent part into the lilypond-data
> binary package.
Could you please document this in the BTS? A package sitting in
queue-new is extremely well hidden. - I suggest to tag the bug
thanks, cu andreas
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"