Given a week or two's grace, the attached conversation may be relevant to people looking for things to remove from testing. -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--- Begin Message ---
- To: bugscan@debian.org
- Subject: packages that should be considered removable
- From: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:38:09 -0500
- Message-id: <oan07wb1u6.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
- In-reply-to: <20040206143002.GA10310@spohr.debian.org> (BugScan reporter's message of "Fri, 6 Feb 2004 06:30:02 -0800")
- References: <20040206143002.GA10310@spohr.debian.org>
I'm not sure if you're the party who deals with this. If not, point me to the proper place, please. I have orphaned the following packages which are also unmaintained upstream. They should be considered removable, IMHO: cl-imho cl-uncommonsql libapache-mod-webapp onshore-timesheet -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@debian.org.....<URL:http://www.debian.org/>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
- Cc: bugscan@debian.org
- Subject: Re: packages that should be considered removable
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:48:52 +0000
- Message-id: <20040206164852.GA28346@riva.ucam.org>
- In-reply-to: <oan07wb1u6.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
- References: <20040206143002.GA10310@spohr.debian.org> <oan07wb1u6.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 11:38:09AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > I'm not sure if you're the party who deals with this. If not, point > me to the proper place, please. > > I have orphaned the following packages which are also unmaintained > upstream. They should be considered removable, IMHO: > > cl-imho > cl-uncommonsql > libapache-mod-webapp > onshore-timesheet I've added [REMOVE] tags for these, thanks. They may get removed from testing in due course. If you actually want them removed from unstable (and hence later testing) straight away, you'll need to file a bug report on ftp.debian.org for each of them, of course. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Cc: bugscan@debian.org
- Subject: Re: packages that should be considered removable
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshored.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:40:47 -0500
- Message-id: <oaisikayxs.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
- In-reply-to: <20040206164852.GA28346@riva.ucam.org> (Colin Watson's message of "Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:48:52 +0000")
- References: <20040206143002.GA10310@spohr.debian.org> <oan07wb1u6.fsf@sopa.onshored.com> <20040206164852.GA28346@riva.ucam.org>
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> writes: > I've added [REMOVE] tags for these, thanks. They may get removed from > testing in due course. Excellent. I can feel less guilty now. > If you actually want them removed from unstable (and hence later > testing) straight away, you'll need to file a bug report on > ftp.debian.org for each of them, of course. Yah yah. I'm going to give it 3 more weeks for adopters. Thanks. -- ...Adam Di Carlo...<adam@onshored.com>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
--- End Message ---