Re: stable with 2.2.11 (was Re: Stable release management)
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> I agree -- it's fine to upgrade to kernel 2.2.x in slink, but
> upgrading libc is just too much of a radical step. Lets do it one
> step at a time, ok?
> So the short list of upgrades:
> * kernel to 2.2.x (personally, I think 2.2.11 is acceptable and
> 2.2.10 is not (2.2.10 has NFS server crashes which I've experienced)
> * any upgrades req'd for kernel 2.2
> * pcmcia
> * X11
> Anything else? I hope not....
A few y2k fixes. Possibly the stable gnome stuff from the staging area (it's
received much testing). Other than that, you have it.
see shy jo