[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608549: ktimetracker: The /usr/bin/karm binary has no man page.



Package: ktimetracker
Version: 4:4.4.7-2
Severity: minor

As a KDE user, I stumbled into the karm binary which has no man page.

Thanks



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ktimetracker depends on:
ii  kdebase-runtime               4:4.4.5-1  runtime components from the offici
ii  kdepim-runtime                4:4.4.7-1  Runtime components for akonadi-kde
ii  libc6                         2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libkcal4                      4:4.4.5-2  library for handling calendar data
ii  libkdecore5                   4:4.4.5-2  the KDE Platform Core Library
ii  libkdepim4                    4:4.4.7-2  KDE PIM library
ii  libkdeui5                     4:4.4.5-2  the KDE Platform User Interface Li
ii  libkio5                       4:4.4.5-2  the Network-enabled File Managemen
ii  libkontactinterface4          4:4.4.5-2  Kontact interface library
ii  libkparts4                    4:4.4.5-2  the Framework for the KDE Platform
ii  libkresources4                4:4.4.5-2  the KDE Resource framework library
ii  libkutils4                    4:4.4.5-2  various utility classes for the KD
ii  libqt4-dbus                   4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii  libqt4-xml                    4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 XML module
ii  libqtcore4                    4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4                     4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libstdc++6                    4.4.5-8    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxss1                       1:1.2.0-2  X11 Screen Saver extension library

ktimetracker recommends no packages.

ktimetracker suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: