Hello, On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 18:31:15 John Lindgren wrote: > On 06/17/2010 08:09 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote: > >> Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto: > >>> I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a > >>> code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I > >>> don't use KDE. :) > >> > >> I agree... Why programs as KHangMan or KTuberling need KNetAttach? > >> > >> I don't like this solution; I'd rather > >> 1) split KNetAttach into a new package, and > > > > Just to be sure, you want a 52kb executable split out because you don't > > want it around, while still pulling in several megabytes of other > > things? > > I would be quite happy if you cut off several megabytes of dependencies. > Currently, Aptitude promises to free 203 MB of disk space if I remove > KCachegrind. That's far too many dependencies for a single program if > you ask me, even if it is meant for a particular desktop environment. KDE is bloated but that's hardly news. And it is offtopic for this bug report and I believe there should be another one about this "issue". -- Modestas Vainius <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.