Bug#463535: reassigning as requested
# reassigning to acpid, athough this looks like a witch hunt :-/
#
# otoh, acpid really looks like a more plausible cause if issues
# than arts;
# still, this doesn't explain *why* downgrading the gtk libs was
# making the issue go away
#
# maybe we're tracking two unrelated bugs in the same report?
reassign 463535 acpid
thanks
Passing this over to acpid makes sense since in my case (the original
reporter) artsd couldn't have been the responsible for this bug since
only thing that might have used artsd would have been kbabel, but I saw
these hangs even when I didn't ran kbabel.
Now I am using again the gtk librabries I initially being the faulty
ones, but I haven't seen the hangs anymore.
Still, around the time of the report the only acpi related upgrades seen
in my dpkg.log are these[1] :
1 eddy@bounty ~/usr/src/pbuilder/pbuilder $ zgrep acpi
/var/log/dpkg.log.2.gz
2008-01-10 14:10:21 upgrade acpi-support-base 0.103-4 0.103-5
2008-01-10 14:10:21 status half-configured acpi-support-base 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:21 status unpacked acpi-support-base 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:21 status half-installed acpi-support-base 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:21 status half-installed acpi-support-base 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:21 status unpacked acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 14:10:21 status unpacked acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 14:10:22 upgrade acpi-support 0.103-4 0.103-5
2008-01-10 14:10:22 status half-configured acpi-support 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:22 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:22 status half-installed acpi-support 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:22 status half-installed acpi-support 0.103-4
2008-01-10 14:10:23 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-10 14:10:23 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:26 status unpacked acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:26 status unpacked acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:26 status unpacked acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:26 status half-configured acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:27 status installed acpi-support-base 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:28 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:28 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-5
[..] (multiple repetions of this line)
2008-01-10 23:38:32 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:32 status unpacked acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:32 status half-configured acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-10 23:38:34 status installed acpi-support 0.103-5
2008-01-15 01:03:07 upgrade libacpi0 0.2-1 0.2-2
2008-01-15 01:03:07 status half-configured libacpi0 0.2-1
2008-01-15 01:03:07 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-1
2008-01-15 01:03:07 status half-installed libacpi0 0.2-1
2008-01-15 01:03:07 status half-installed libacpi0 0.2-1
2008-01-15 01:03:07 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-01-15 01:03:08 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-01-15 01:05:02 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-01-15 01:05:03 status half-configured libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-01-15 01:05:06 status installed libacpi0 0.2-2
0 eddy@bounty ~/usr/src/pbuilder/pbuilder $ grep acpi /var/log/dpkg.log.1
2008-02-13 22:31:31 upgrade libacpi0 0.2-2 0.2-4
2008-02-13 22:31:31 status half-configured libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-02-13 22:31:31 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-02-13 22:31:31 status half-installed libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-02-13 22:31:31 status half-installed libacpi0 0.2-2
2008-02-13 22:31:31 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-4
2008-02-13 22:31:31 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-4
2008-02-13 22:32:49 status unpacked libacpi0 0.2-4
2008-02-13 22:32:49 status half-configured libacpi0 0.2-4
2008-02-13 22:32:49 status installed libacpi0 0.2-4
Still, I fail to see how the usage of the previous version of GTK libs
was enough to work around the issue.
[1] it is possible that they really *are* related to the issue since I
was keeping the laptop on for long periods of time and just suspended it
when I was supposed to log out; OTOH I was experiencing the hang issue
for while already when I reported the issue
--
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
Reply to: