[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#380642: marked as done (kde-i18n-de: wrong translation for a kdevelop project template)



Your message dated Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:41:01 -0400
with message-id <9f694b820711021141p4d6ee80dtfd3d69d3a6a1cf95@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line closing old bug 380642 in Debian BTS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kde-i18n-de
Version: 4:3.5.3-1
Severity: minor

Hi,

kdevelop contains two qmake application templates, one for qt3 and one
for qt4 projects. However in a german-localized version of kdevelop one
cannot distinguish both in the list of templates. The reason is that

Qt4/QMake Application

is translated into "Anwendung", which is wrong. It is important to
mention the Qt4 here too.

The original text is in
kdevelop/languages/cpp/app_templates/qt4qmakeapp/qt4qmakeapp.

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.6
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages kde-i18n-de depends on:
ii  kdelibs4c2a                   4:3.5.4-2  core libraries and binaries for al

kde-i18n-de recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I'm closing this old bug report in Debian BTS as requested by submitter.

Thanks,
Olivier Vitrat


--- End Message ---

Reply to: