[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#184084: marked as done (libqt3-compat-headers as dependency)

Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 17:06:01 +0200
with message-id <20060511150601.GA29041@mad.intersec.fr>
and subject line libqt3-compat-headers as dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libqt3-headers
Version: 3:3.1.1-5

The package libqt3-compat-headers really need to be a dependency of the 
package libqt3-headers - almost every KDE/QT program need one or more of 
these compatiblity header-files and will fail to compile if this package 
isn't installed.

I can't see a reason why this package as a dependency should be a bad thing - 
it will make the life alot easier for people not aware of this package.

-- 
Regards

Lasse Bang Mikkelsen
lbm@fatalerror.dk

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 05:29:18PM +0100, Lasse Bang Mikkelsen wrote:
> Package: libqt3-headers
> Version: 3:3.1.1-5
> 
> The package libqt3-compat-headers really need to be a dependency of the 
> package libqt3-headers - almost every KDE/QT program need one or more of 
> these compatiblity header-files and will fail to compile if this package 
> isn't installed.
> 
> I can't see a reason why this package as a dependency should be a bad thing - 
> it will make the life alot easier for people not aware of this package.

  I don't agree fully a Recommends would have been better.
  Moreover, this is not accurate anymore: qt2 is very outdated now, and
relying on compat-headers when qt4 is already out is a bad thing (TM).
It does not even deserves a Suggest now IMHO.

  closing the bug.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: