Bug#343214: Manpages for lisa and reslisa

[Achim Bohnet <ach@mpe.mpg.de>]

On Tuesday 13 December 2005 20:39, François Wendling wrote:
> Achim Bohnet wrote:
> 
> > You're using the GFDL for the manpages.  This license is considered
> > non-free by The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG).
> > http://www.de.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines
> > It would be really great if you change the license to, e.g. GPL.
> > Otherwise our manpages have to notadded/removed or go into the
> > non-free section before the next debian release.
> 
> Modified versions are joined...lisa is licensed under the terms of the GPL, 
> the associated manpages should be too :)

Thx a lot.
> 
> > Mhmm you used resLISa and LISa.  Way upstream likes it or typo?
> 
> Upstream, resLISa and LISa are used, but reslisa and lisa too. Some lines from 
> the README.gz, written by the author :
> 
> "LISa is intended to provide a kind of "network neighbourhood" but only [...]"
> 
> "lisa and reslisa are distributed under the GNU General Public License."
> 
> IMHO, "lisa" stands for the program, and LISa for the concept.

Fine.  Thx for the info.

Achim
> 
> 
> François.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com