Bug#317087: marked as done (kdenetwork: upgrade causes a segmentation fault in KMail)
Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:32:13 +0100
with message-id <42CBEB6D.10407@codehelp.co.uk>
and subject line Wrong package to blame
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2005 05:57:31 +0000
>From linux@codehelp.co.uk Tue Jul 05 22:57:31 2005
Return-path: <linux@codehelp.co.uk>
Received: from (garfield.codehelp) [82.152.192.128]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dq2uZ-0003MW-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:57:31 -0700
Received: from neil by garfield.codehelp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dq2uG-0001I0-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:57:12 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neil Williams <linux@codehelp.co.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kdenetwork: upgrade causes a segmentation fault in KMail
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:57:12 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Dq2uG-0001I0-00@garfield.codehelp>
Sender: Neil Williams <neil@garfield.codehelp>
X-BadReturnPath: neil@garfield.codehelp rewritten as linux@codehelp.co.uk
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kdenetwork
Version: 4:3.3.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upgraded kdenetwork last night and now kmail won't start -
segmentation fault but no crash handler appears.
kmail information:
Architecture: i386
Source: kdepim
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Replaces: libkdenetwork2 (<< 4:3.2.92)
Provides: imap-client, mail-reader
Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-4.0.2), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgcc1
(>= 1:3.4.1-3), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libkcal2a(>= 4:3.3.2),
libkdenetwork2 (>= 4:3.3.1), libkdepim1 (>= 4:3.3.2), libkleopatra0a,
libkpimidentities1 (>= 4:3.3.1), libksieve0 (>= 4:3.3.1), libmimelib1a,
libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel), libqt3c102-mt (>= 3:3.3.4), libsm6 | xlibs (>>
4.1.0), libstdc++5(>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxext6
| xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), perl
Recommends: kdebase-kio-plugins, kdepim-kio-plugins, procmail
Suggests: gnupg, gnupg-agent, pinentry-qt | pinentry-x11, kaddressbook,
kleopatra, spamassassin | bogofilter | annoyance-filter, clamav |
f-prot-installer
Filename: pool/main/k/kdepim/kmail_3.3.2-3_i386.deb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages kdenetwork depends on:
ii dcoprss 4:3.3.2-6 KDE RSS utilities
ii kdenetwork-filesharing 4:3.3.2-6 KDE Network Filesharing Configurat
ii kdict 4:3.3.2-6 KDE Dictionary Client
ii kget 4:3.3.2-6 KDE Download Manager
ii knewsticker 4:3.3.2-6 KDE news ticker
ii kopete 4:3.3.2-6 Instant messenger program
ii kpf 4:3.3.2-6 KDE public fileserver
ii kppp 4:3.3.2-6 KDE dialer and frontend to pppd
ii krdc 4:3.3.2-6 KDE Remote Desktop Client
ii krfb 4:3.3.2-6 KDE Remote Screen Server
ii ksirc 4:3.3.2-6 KDE IRC client
ii kwifimanager 4:3.3.2-6 KDE Wireless Lan Manager
ii librss1 4:3.3.2-6 KDE RSS library
Versions of packages kdenetwork recommends:
ii ktalkd 4:3.3.2-6 KDE talk daemon
ii lisa 4:3.3.2-6 LAN Information Server
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 317087-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2005 14:32:06 +0000
>From linux@codehelp.co.uk Wed Jul 06 07:32:06 2005
Return-path: <linux@codehelp.co.uk>
Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [212.104.129.88]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqAwW-0003Ha-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:32:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5032E2DC9
for <317087-close@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:32:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 30446-01-19 for <317087-close@bugs.debian.org>;
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:32:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [82.152.192.128])
by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3542E2B60
for <317087-close@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:31:59 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <42CBEB6D.10407@codehelp.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:32:13 +0100
From: Neil Williams <linux@codehelp.co.uk>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 317087-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Wrong package to blame
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk
Delivered-To: 317087-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
After downgrading kdenetwork to the previously installed version (when
kmail was still working), the same fault remains in kmail so this can't
be the fault of kdenetwork. I've added information to an existing kmail
bug about the remaining issue.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Reply to: