[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#297908: marked as done (kmail should depend on procmail)



Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:35:28 +0200
with message-id <20050405113528.GA18574@chistera.yi.org>
and subject line fixed in kmail 3.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 14:17:07 +0000
>From qaz99af@123mail.org Thu Mar 03 06:17:07 2005
Return-path: <qaz99af@123mail.org>
Received: from smtp05.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.145] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6r8U-0008Vg-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 06:17:07 -0800
Received: from jojo (c529ced2c.cable.wanadoo.nl [82.156.237.44])
	by smtp5.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A3F34F32
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2005 15:17:05 +0100 (CET)
From: johannes <qaz99af@123mail.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: kmail should depend on procmail
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:17:04 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503031517.04755.qaz99af@123mail.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Subject: kmail should depend on procmail
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-2
Severity: normal

*** Please type your report below this line ***

kmail gives the following error while getting mail from local mailbox 
in /var/mail/user
with locking method "Procmail lockfile"

sh: lockfile: command not found

after installing procmail, kmail works again




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-15 
(charmap=ISO-8859-15)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297908-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2005 11:35:31 +0000
>From asp16@alu.ua.es Tue Apr 05 04:35:31 2005
Return-path: <asp16@alu.ua.es>
Received: from 84-120-77-228.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.77.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DImLC-0004fs-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:35:31 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.50) 
	  id 1DImLA-0004qu-Pc
	  for 297908-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:35:28 +0200
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:35:28 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16@alu.ua.es>
To: 297908-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in kmail 3.3.2-3
Message-ID: <20050405113528.GA18574@chistera.yi.org>
Reply-To: 297908@bugs.debian.org,
	Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16@alu.ua.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 297908-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

  Hello,

    this bug has been fixed in kmail 3.3.2-3, which now recommends
    procmail. Closing.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
He who has not a good memory should never take upon himself the trade of lying.
                -- Michel de Montaigne



Reply to: