Bug#301001: kmail: freezes sometimes
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-0pre1
Severity: important
KMail sometimes hangs for a certain amount of time (maybe about 30
seconds but it's possible that I err here). I think, this problem
started after upgrading to this very version. The freezes happen in
various situations - when sending an e-mail, when scrolling through a
mail message in the main window, etc., etc. KMail doesn't crash, it's
just that I have to wait for a rather long time until KMail continuous
to work as expected again.
I don't know what other information to provide at the moment. If you
want more, please tell me exactly what information you want and how to
provide it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-pike
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-1 KDE core libraries
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkcal2a 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE calendaring library
ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE Network library
ii libkdepim1 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE PIM library
ii libkleopatra0a 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries
ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE PIM user identity information
ii libksieve0 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE mail/news message filtering li
ii libmimelib1a 4:3.3.2-0pre1 KDE mime library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
Reply to: