Bug#198152: marked as done (konqueror: crashes on first launch. subequent launches succeed)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
with message-id <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
and subject line Bug no longer relevant, so closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2003 06:37:26 +0000
>From jlb@houseofdistraction.com Fri Jun 20 01:37:26 2003
Return-path: <jlb@houseofdistraction.com>
Received: from houseofdistraction.com [206.63.251.121]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19TFWY-0001aH-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:37:26 -0500
Received: from (belly) [192.168.1.4] (jlb)
by houseofdistraction.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19TFWW-0005DQ-00; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:37:24 -0700
Received: by belly (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:37:24 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Bowden <jlb@houseofdistraction.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: konqueror: crashes on first launch. subequent launches succeed
Bcc: Jeff Bowden <jlb@houseofdistraction.com>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.2
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:37:24 -0700
Message-Id: <E19TFWW-0005DQ-00@houseofdistraction.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.1.2-1
Severity: normal
subject line says it all
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux belly 2.4.21-ac1-nas-mppe #2 Sun Jun 15 10:56:04 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages konqueror depends on:
ii kate 4:3.1.2-1 KDE Advanced Text Editor
ii kcontrol 4:3.1.2-1 KDE Control Center
ii kdelibs4 4:3.1.2-2 KDE core libraries
ii kfind 4:3.1.2-1 KDE File Find Utility
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.12-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-1 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3-3 GCC support library
ii libjpeg62 6b-8 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkonq4 4:3.1.2-1 Core libraries for KDE's file mana
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.1.1-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii xlibs 4.3.0-0ds4 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-12 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* konqueror/crypto:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 198152-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:03:29 +0000
>From christopher.martin@utoronto.ca Sun Jan 16 18:03:29 2005
Return-path: <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqMEo-0002G9-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:03:26 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.49.17.55])
by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050117020322.SUTX25979.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.0.100]>;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
To: 89622-done@bugs.debian.org,
107756-done@bugs.debian.org,
116585-done@bugs.debian.org,
121344-done@bugs.debian.org,
121933-done@bugs.debian.org,
123535-done@bugs.debian.org,
131545-done@bugs.debian.org,
145376-done@bugs.debian.org,
156949-done@bugs.debian.org,
193124-done@bugs.debian.org,
201189-done@bugs.debian.org,
203709-done@bugs.debian.org,
219906-done@bugs.debian.org,
237042-done@bugs.debian.org,
243956-done@bugs.debian.org,
253700-done@bugs.debian.org,
180352-done@bugs.debian.org,
194398-done@bugs.debian.org,
196679-done@bugs.debian.org,
196723-done@bugs.debian.org,
197369-done@bugs.debian.org,
197425-done@bugs.debian.org,
198152-done@bugs.debian.org,
198306-done@bugs.debian.org,
200314-done@bugs.debian.org,
202685-done@bugs.debian.org,
205009-done@bugs.debian.org,
207556-done@bugs.debian.org,
209305-done@bugs.debian.org,
211542-done@bugs.debian.org,
212925-done@bugs.debian.org,
216073-done@bugs.debian.org,
216929-done@bugs.debian.org,
217300-done@bugs.debian.org,
217717-done@bugs.debian.org,
222662-done@bugs.debian.org,
227199-done@bugs.debian.org,
231688-done@bugs.debian.org,
232501-done@bugs.debian.org,
234111-done@bugs.debian.org,
234656-done@bugs.debian.org,
238813-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug no longer relevant, so closing
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: 198152-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16
Hello,
This bug is being closed because of its age and the vanishingly small
chance that it is still relevant to the current KDE packages, as it was
clearly since fixed, a random unreproducible bug that never had enough of
a follow-up to be useful, or else was forwarded upstream, where it was
marked fixed some time ago.
In case I'm mistaken, please do re-open the bug report in question, and
explain how the report is still relevant.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Reply to: