Bug#107756: marked as done (printing some webpages gives white sheets)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
with message-id <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
and subject line Bug no longer relevant, so closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2001 02:59:46 +0000
>From paolo@redaelli.mine.nu Sun Aug 05 21:59:46 2001
Return-path: <paolo@redaelli.mine.nu>
Received: from root by master.debian.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Taal-0002Ct-0L; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:58:07 -0500
Received: from klecker.debian.org [198.186.203.20] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15TZVR-0000KJ-01; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 20:48:33 -0500
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]
by klecker.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15T4TL-0001WB-00; Sat, 04 Aug 2001 09:40:19 -0700
Received: (qmail 16903 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2001 16:33:37 -0000
Received: from flat-pool19-mdm211.aruba.it (HELO redaelli.mine.nu) (62.149.158.213)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2001 16:33:37 -0000
Received: by redaelli.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4997BEF26; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 18:29:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Paolo Redaelli <paolo@redaelli.mine.nu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: printing some webpages gives white sheets
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.22
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.22
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 18:29:37 +0200
Message-Id: <20010804162937.A4997BEF26@redaelli.mine.nu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:2.2.0-0.1beta1-2
Severity: normal
Precisely the URL
http://www.kalgoorlieandwagoldfields.com.au/default.html
when printed produces exactly one blank sheet.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux altair 2.4.7 #22 SMP Sat Jul 28 23:43:45 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages konqueror depends on:
ii debconf 0.9.81 Debian configuration management sy
ii kdebase-libs 4:2.2.0-0.1beta1-2 KDE libraries amd modules for kdeb
ii kdelibs3 4:2.2.0-0beta1-5 KDE core libraries (runtime files)
ii lesstif1 1:0.92.32-1 OSF/Motif implementation released
ii libarts 4:2.2.0-0beta1-5 aRts Sound system
ii libc6 2.2.3-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libjpeg62 6b-1.3 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkonq3 4:2.2.0-0.1beta1-2 Core libraries for KDE's file mana
ii libpng2 1.0.12-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt2 2:2.3.1-6 Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2. 1:2.95.4-0.010703 The GNU stdc++ library
ii xlibs 4.0.3-4 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-15 compression library - runtime
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 107756-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:03:31 +0000
>From christopher.martin@utoronto.ca Sun Jan 16 18:03:31 2005
Return-path: <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqMEo-0002G9-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:03:26 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.49.17.55])
by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050117020322.SUTX25979.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.0.100]>;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
To: 89622-done@bugs.debian.org,
107756-done@bugs.debian.org,
116585-done@bugs.debian.org,
121344-done@bugs.debian.org,
121933-done@bugs.debian.org,
123535-done@bugs.debian.org,
131545-done@bugs.debian.org,
145376-done@bugs.debian.org,
156949-done@bugs.debian.org,
193124-done@bugs.debian.org,
201189-done@bugs.debian.org,
203709-done@bugs.debian.org,
219906-done@bugs.debian.org,
237042-done@bugs.debian.org,
243956-done@bugs.debian.org,
253700-done@bugs.debian.org,
180352-done@bugs.debian.org,
194398-done@bugs.debian.org,
196679-done@bugs.debian.org,
196723-done@bugs.debian.org,
197369-done@bugs.debian.org,
197425-done@bugs.debian.org,
198152-done@bugs.debian.org,
198306-done@bugs.debian.org,
200314-done@bugs.debian.org,
202685-done@bugs.debian.org,
205009-done@bugs.debian.org,
207556-done@bugs.debian.org,
209305-done@bugs.debian.org,
211542-done@bugs.debian.org,
212925-done@bugs.debian.org,
216073-done@bugs.debian.org,
216929-done@bugs.debian.org,
217300-done@bugs.debian.org,
217717-done@bugs.debian.org,
222662-done@bugs.debian.org,
227199-done@bugs.debian.org,
231688-done@bugs.debian.org,
232501-done@bugs.debian.org,
234111-done@bugs.debian.org,
234656-done@bugs.debian.org,
238813-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug no longer relevant, so closing
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: 107756-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hello,
This bug is being closed because of its age and the vanishingly small
chance that it is still relevant to the current KDE packages, as it was
clearly since fixed, a random unreproducible bug that never had enough of
a follow-up to be useful, or else was forwarded upstream, where it was
marked fixed some time ago.
In case I'm mistaken, please do re-open the bug report in question, and
explain how the report is still relevant.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Reply to: