Bug#248891: marked as done (kuser: UID sort should be in number order, not ascii order)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:13:59 +0100
with message-id <20041105151359.GA10966@chistera.yi.org>
and subject line Bug#248891: kuser: UID sort should be in number order, not ascii order
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2004 16:21:59 +0000
>From pierre.thierry@moine-fou.org Thu May 13 09:21:59 2004
Return-path: <pierre.thierry@moine-fou.org>
Received: from pthierry.net1.nerim.net (imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org) [213.41.153.205] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOIy7-0006KL-00; Thu, 13 May 2004 09:21:59 -0700
Received: by imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E3F898E084; Thu, 13 May 2004 18:21:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 18:21:56 +0200
From: Pierre THIERRY <pierre.thierry@moine-fou.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kuser: UID sort should be in number order, not ascii order
Message-ID: <20040513162156.GA27882@imperatrice.arcanes>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.58
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.21-bateleur i686
X-Sheldon-Has-Said: Mange ton =?iso-8859-1?B?Y+Jj4uI=?= !
X-Uptime: 92 days (after 268 days)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: kuser
Version: 4:3.2.2-1
Severity: normal
I don't see why anyone could want the UIDs in ascii order (1,10,11,100
and so on...). Why aren't they sorted in numer order?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-bateleur
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR@euro
Versions of packages kuser depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.2-2 KDE core libraries
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D gr=
aphi
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-6 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runti=
me v
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System Session Manage=
ment
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System protocol clien=
t li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous =
exte
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client l=
ibra
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System client librari=
es m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
--=20
pierre.thierry@moine-fou.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAo6Ckxe13INnVDYoRAvxQAJ9ksco2lM8jTmiq0Q9refeFxM2AmACfW96Q
TmACm6G+GLa0bvnU+McTkxQ=
=tIiC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248891-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2004 15:14:06 +0000
>From asp16@alu.ua.es Fri Nov 05 07:14:06 2004
Return-path: <asp16@alu.ua.es>
Received: from 84-120-65-92.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.65.92]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CQ5mv-00050y-00; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 07:14:06 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CQ5mq-0004PJ-95; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 16:14:00 +0100
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:13:59 +0100
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16@alu.ua.es>
To: Pierre THIERRY <pierre.thierry@moine-fou.org>,
248891-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#248891: kuser: UID sort should be in number order, not ascii order
Message-ID: <20041105151359.GA10966@chistera.yi.org>
References: <20040513162156.GA27882@imperatrice.arcanes>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20040513162156.GA27882@imperatrice.arcanes>
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 248891-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
* Pierre THIERRY [Thu, 13 May 2004 18:21:56 +0200]:
> Package: kuser
> Version: 4:3.2.2-1
> Severity: normal
> I don't see why anyone could want the UIDs in ascii order (1,10,11,100
> and so on...). Why aren't they sorted in numer order?
this bug is fixed in kuser from kde 3.3.x.
thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Kindness is a language which the deaf can hear and the blind can read.
-- Mark Twain
Reply to: