Bug#275211: kmail does not start (another relocation error)
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:30 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Josh Metzler [Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:05:18 -0400]:
> > My comments
> > to the original reporter about new debian revisions adding new symbols
> > applies here, too.
>
> I don't think it's the case, the symbol reported not to exist by the
It is the case. The symbol
_ZN4KPIM17AddresseeLineEdit7processERK8QCStringRK9QMemArrayIcERS1_RS5_
exists in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-3, but not in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-2.
Why is this? New symbols shouldn't be appearing just in new Debian
revisions, should they? If kmail 4:3.3.0-3 really needs libkdepim
4:3.3.0-3 and wont work with 4:3.3.0-2, then it either needs an explicit
depends =4:3.3.0-3, or something needs to be done to keep it from using the
new symbols.
Josh
Reply to: