Bug#266633: marked as done (kontact: Doesn't start)
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:05:05 -0700
with message-id <87pt50v5vy.fsf@frobnitz.ddts.net>
and subject line kontact is version 4:3.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 14:09:08 +0000
>From jgoerzen@excelhustler.com Wed Aug 18 07:09:08 2004
Return-path: <jgoerzen@excelhustler.com>
Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com (gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BxR7k-0001QC-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:09:08 -0700
Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown [192.168.0.12])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com", Issuer "excelhustler.com" (not verified))
by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7274A83075; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:08:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4721A8302F; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:08:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.0.12])
by localhost (chatterbox [192.168.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
with ESMTP id 30545-01; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:08:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com [192.168.1.34])
by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4A0FE60503; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:08:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3AE7A290A4; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:08:36 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kontact: Doesn't start
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:08:36 -0500
Message-Id: <20040818140836.3AE7A290A4@wile.internal.excelhustler.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at excelhustler.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kontact
Version: 4:3.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to start kontact, I get a brief splash screen, then:
$ kontact
DCOPRef: call 'unreadMessages' on null reference error
*** KMail got signal 11 (Crashing)
ERROR: Communication problem with kontact, it probably crashed.
However, starting kmail by itself works fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages kontact depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1 KDE core libraries
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkcal2 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE calendaring library
ii libkdepim1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE PIM library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2004 20:05:07 +0000
>From daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net Sun Sep 05 13:05:07 2004
Return-path: <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C43G6-0007JT-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:05:07 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1C43G5-0002eq-00
for 266633-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:05:05 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C43G5-0001Uf-JF
for 266633-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:05:05 -0700
To: 266633-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: kontact is version 4:3.3.0-2
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:05:05 -0700
Message-ID: <87pt50v5vy.fsf@frobnitz.ddts.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Delivered-To: 266633-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This bug should no longer be applicable since kontact in sid is the
3.3.0 version, and the version in sarge doesn't have this problem
AFAIK.
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
Reply to: