Bug#263585: marked as done (konsole doesn't honor command line setting)
Your message dated Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:34:53 +0200
with message-id <20040805103453.GA7945@chistera.yi.org>
and subject line Bug#263585: konsole doesn't honor command line setting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 09:44:43 +0000
>From dh@physnet.uni-hamburg.de Thu Aug 05 02:44:43 2004
Return-path: <dh@physnet.uni-hamburg.de>
Received: from mail.physnet.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.106.230]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bsenj-0001qa-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:44:43 -0700
Received: from kir.physnet.uni-hamburg.de ([134.100.105.153] helo=localhost)
by mail.physnet.uni-hamburg.de with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.40)
id 1BsenY-007Qry-Ib
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:44:35 +0200
Received: from dh by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bsenc-0002If-SN; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:44:36 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dh <dhaude@physnet.uni-hamburg.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: konsole doesn't honor command line setting
Reply-To: dhaude@physnet.uni-hamburg.de
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:44:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Bsenc-0002If-SN@localhost>
Sender: dh <dh@physnet.uni-hamburg.de>
X-Spam-Score: -4.8 [-47] (----) scanned by SPAMASSASSIN from PHYSnet-RZ
X-Virus-Scanned-By: Amavis with Sophos Anti-Virus on mail.physnet.uni-hamburg.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: konsole
Version: 4:3.2.2-1
Severity: normal
I'm trying to get a login shell in Konsole by having "bash --login"
in the "Execute" field of the "Session" tab of the "Configure Konsole"
menu. However, I never get a login shell. In fact I can put whatever
I want in there; I always just get a (non-login) shell.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages konsole depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.3-2 KDE core libraries
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.4-3 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-4 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System event recording an
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263585-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 10:34:56 +0000
>From asp16@alu.ua.es Thu Aug 05 03:34:56 2004
Return-path: <asp16@alu.ua.es>
Received: from 84-120-64-93.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.64.93]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BsfaJ-0000Dx-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 03:34:55 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BsfaH-0002XO-K9; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 12:34:53 +0200
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:34:53 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16@alu.ua.es>
To: dhaude@physnet.uni-hamburg.de, 263585-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#263585: konsole doesn't honor command line setting
Message-ID: <20040805103453.GA7945@chistera.yi.org>
References: <[🔎] E1Bsenc-0002If-SN@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1Bsenc-0002If-SN@localhost>
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: 263585-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
hi,
* dh [Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:44:36 +0200]:
> I'm trying to get a login shell in Konsole by having "bash --login"
> in the "Execute" field of the "Session" tab of the "Configure Konsole"
> menu.
there is a list of "types of session" in the left there. I, e.g., have
"Linux Console", "Midnight Commander", "Shell" and some others there.
Please make sure you are editing the command of the one you use, most
likely "Shell".
> However, I never get a login shell. In fact I can put whatever
> I want in there; I always just get a (non-login) shell.
I recommend you to restart konsole after changes, or manually select
Menu -> Session -> New Shell (or "New whatever"), in order for the
changes to take effect.
I'm closing the bug, since I'm 100% confident that konsole works as
advertised. If you have any trouble, contact me by private mail or ask
in an appropriate IRC channel.
thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
Reply to: