Bug#249784: [patch] SELinux support in KDM 3.2.2
dear kde developers,
a surprisingly simple patch has been submitted via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249784
for SELinux support in kdm. it compiles, and my p800 machine
is presently churning away (2 hours and counting) at doing a
complete build of kde .debs arg.
if you need any incentive, gdm has already accepted a similar
patch, upstream, and it's available, as demonstrated by this:
Package: gdm
Priority: optional
Section: gnome
Installed-Size: 6472
Maintainer: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.4.4.7-3
Provides: x-display-manager
Depends: adduser, debconf (>= 0.5), dpkg (>= 1.9), libart-2.0-2 (>=
2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.4.1), libattr1 (>= 2.4.4-1), libbonobo2-0 (>=
2.4.3), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.4.3), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgconf2-4
(>= 2.4.0.1), libglade2-0, libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.2.3), libgnome2-0,
libgnomecanvas2-0, libgnomeui-0, libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.4.1),
libgnomevfs2-common (>= 2.4.1), libgsf-1 (>= 1.9.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>=
2.2.1-3), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.8.0), libpam0g
(>= 0.76), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.2.1), libpopt0 (>= 1.7), librsvg2-2 (>=
2.5.0), libselinux1 (>= 1.10), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libwrap0,
^^^^^^^^^^^
libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxml2 (>=
2.6.8), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), libpam-modules (>= 0.72-1), libpam-runtime
(>= 0.76-13.1), gnome-session | xterm | x-window-manager |
x-terminal-emulator, xbase-clients, gksu (>= 1.0.7)
which i include here for your reference in order that you may
obtain the correct version of libselinux against which the patch
will need to be built.
l.
--
--
expecting email to be received and understood is a bit like
picking up the telephone and immediately dialing without
checking for a dial-tone; speaking immediately without listening
for either an answer or ring-tone; hanging up immediately and
believing that you have actually started a conversation.
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net";> lkcl.net </a> <br />
<a href="mailto:lkcl@lkcl.net";> lkcl@lkcl.net </a> <br />
Reply to: