Bug#247637: kmail: unable to handle base64
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.2.2-2
Severity: normal
Apparently Kmail is not able to handle base64 encoded messages like
this:
--qC1cgMVBgZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
content-transfer-encoding: base64
VGVzdA==
--qC1cgMVBgZ--
I'm not sure this way of formatting mail is standard, however it
begins to be more and more usual with phone that send mails like
imode. Is there anything that could be done in order to make these
mails readable. Some mail software seems capable to handle that, like
IMP (web client).
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro
Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.2.2-1 KDE I/O Slaves
ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.2-2 KDE core libraries
ii ktnef 4:3.2.2-2 KDE TNEF viewer
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-6 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0-7 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkcal2 4:3.2.2-2 KDE calendaring library
ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.2.2-2 KDE Network library
ii libkdepim1 4:3.2.2-2 KDE PIM library
ii libksieve0 4:3.2.2-2 KDE mail/news message filtering li
ii libmimelib1 4:3.2.2-2 KDE mime library
ii libpcre3 4.5-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0-7 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0-7 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.3.0-7 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
Reply to: