[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247365: KDM should use /etc/dm/Sessions as a source for its .desktop files or ship a xfce4.desktop



On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 07:10:18PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Package: kdm
> Severity: wishlist
> Version: 4:3.2.2-1
> 
> KDM should probably just avoid duplication of effort and use the
> *.desktop files in /etc/dm/Sessions that gdm is starting to use instead
> of shipping its own.

I'm sorry you are wrong.

Quoted directly from GDM docs:

--

The remaining configuration is done by dropping scripts in the
subdirectories of the /etc/gdm/ folder or dropping .desktop-style files
in /etc/dm/Sessions/ or /etc/X11/sessions/.  The latter is also read by
KDM for common configuration.  The /etc/dm/Sessions/ directory will
likely move in the future to reflect that it is GDM specific and used
only for the default configuration.  Also the default setup will also
read /share/xsessions/ (which should be /usr/share/xsessions/ if you
really wish to cooperate with KDM) where desktop packages can install
their session files.  The directories under the /etc should be reserved
for configuration.  This approach makes it easy for package management
systems to install window managers and different session types without
requiring the sysadmin to edit files.  See the SessionDesktopDir
onfiguration key for changing the paths.  Note that prior to version
2.4.4.2 only the /etc/dm/Sessions/ was being read.

--

> If you're unwilling to do this please include the attached xfce4.desktop
> for the XFce4 desktop environment.

The maintainer of XFce4 needs to provide a xfce4.desktop file in the
/usr/share/xessions/ dir just like I did for kde so that both dm's can
see the file. It is not the DM's place to ship .desktop files for every
WM in existence. Afaict GDM provides none by default and KDM only
provides 48 by default. If you need more information ask the GDM
maintainer Ryan Murray...

Thanks,
Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: