Bug#242603: marked as done (konversation should be added to kdenetwork)
Your message dated Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:35:01 +0200
with message-id <20040407193501.GB25356@chistera>
and subject line Bug#242603: konversation should be added to kdenetwork
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2004 16:16:55 +0000
>From gal@aftershock.co.il Wed Apr 07 09:16:55 2004
Return-path: <gal@aftershock.co.il>
Received: from napo.bezeqint.net [192.115.104.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BBFjT-0004vM-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 09:16:55 -0700
Received: from napo.bezeqint.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by napo.bezeqint.net (Bezeq International SMTP out Mail Server) with SMTP
id 25F671CC944; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:16:53 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([IP=62.219.77.24]) by eSafe SMTP Relay 1081336282; Wed Apr 7 19:16:52 2004
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gal Ben-Haim <gal@aftershock.co.il>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: konversation should be added to kdenetwork
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:16:52 +0300
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20040407161653.25F671CC944@napo.bezeqint.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
Package: kdenetwork
Version: 4:3.2.1-1
Severity: wishlist
the IRC client konversation should be added to kdenetwork, it's pretty
easy and compfortable..
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4-1-686
Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8
Versions of packages kdenetwork depends on:
ii dcoprss 4:3.2.1-1 KDE RSS utilities
ii kdict 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Dictionary Client
ii kget 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Download Manager
ii knewsticker 4:3.2.1-1 KDE news ticker
ii kopete 4:3.2.1-1 Instant messenger program
ii kpf 4:3.2.1-1 KDE public fileserver
ii kppp 4:3.2.1-1 KDE dialer and frontend to pppd
ii krdc 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Remote Desktop Client
ii krfb 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Remote Screen Server
ii ksirc 4:3.2.1-1 KDE IRC client
ii kwifimanager 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Wireless Lan Manager
ii librss1 4:3.2.1-1 KDE RSS library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242603-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2004 19:35:06 +0000
>From asp16@alu.ua.es Wed Apr 07 12:35:06 2004
Return-path: <asp16@alu.ua.es>
Received: from mail.alu.ua.es [193.145.233.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BBIpG-0000FP-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:35:06 -0700
Received: from mail.alu.ua.es (mail.alu.ua.es [193.145.233.9])
by mail.alu.ua.es (8.9.3p2-20030919/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA152928
for <242603-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:35:03 +0200
Received: from chistera (alc1-interjet256-159-105.medtelecom.net [62.117.159.105])
by mail.alu.ua.es (8.9.3p2-20030919/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA78634;
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:35:02 +0200
Received: from adeodato by chistera with local (Exim 4.31)
id 1BBIpB-0006hA-5H; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:35:01 +0200
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:35:01 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <asp16@alu.ua.es>
To: Gal Ben-Haim <gal@aftershock.co.il>, 242603-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#242603: konversation should be added to kdenetwork
Message-ID: <20040407193501.GB25356@chistera>
References: <[🔎] 20040407161653.25F671CC944@napo.bezeqint.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040407161653.25F671CC944@napo.bezeqint.net>
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 242603-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Gal Ben-Haim [Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:16:52 +0300]:
> Package: kdenetwork
> Version: 4:3.2.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
> the IRC client konversation should be added to kdenetwork, it's pretty
> easy and compfortable..
First, which packages form part of kdenetwork is decided by KDE
upstream, not by Debian. The policy is, I think, quality. Kopete,
for example, was not part of kdenetwork previously, and now it is.
If Konversation continues to improve, it will probably enter
kdenetwork someday.
Second, yor wishlist probably refers to konversation being available
as a Debian package. Then there are good news for you: a Debian
package has been created (in fact, two ;-) and will be available in
your mirror in, say, a week or so.
I'm closing this bug, hope everybody is ok with that.
--=20
Adeodato Sim=F3 (a.k.a. thibaut)
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | IM: my_dato [jabber.org] | PK: DA6AE621
=20
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkB0V+UACgkQTxqZjtpq5iG1PACgraHy5PubmpHzeJ179+fJh1nS
3c0An1O53fy5Eoyv9cpKWlk2+b9Bfzj7
=umiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG--
Reply to: