Bug#240329: fails to launch
Le dimanche 4 Avril 2004 12:20, vous avez écrit :
> DEGAND Nicolas writes:
> > Le dimanche 28 Mars 2004 17:20, Dominique Devriese a écrit :
> >> DEGAND Nicolas writes:
> >> > Le dimanche 28 Mars 2004 16:35, Riku Voipio a écrit :
> >> >> package knode tags 240329 +unreproducible thanks
> >> >>
> >> >> On Friday 26 March 2004 21:35, Nicolas DEGAND wrote:
> >> >> > if I launch knode, it uses the hard drive extensively then
> >> >> > fails with the following message :
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you follow the instructions here, by installing the debug
> >> >> packages and getting a crash backtrace or a valgrind output?
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.kde-debian.org/~domi/debugging-kde-crash.html
> >> >
> >> > Neither knode or kdepim appear to be in the debug packages. I
> >> > could find time to compile the source packages, but it will take
> >> > some time.
> >>
> >> Don't bother, I'm working on this. Furthermore, you should also
> >> install the kdelibs and qt debug packages, in order to get useful
> >> backtraces.
> >
> > OK. Could you mail me or post in this bug report when kdepim or
> > knode is available with debug output. ?
>
> The server has just been fixed, apparently. The debug packages are
> available now.
I suppose I should have expected that. At least 1°. I installed the following
debug packages :
ii kdelibs 3.2.1-1debug1 KDE core libraries metapackage
ii kdelibs-bin 3.2.1-1debug1 KDE core binaries
ii kdelibs-data 3.2.1-1debug1 KDE core shared data
ii kdelibs4 3.2.1-1debug1 KDE core libraries
ii knode 3.2.1-1debug1 KDE news reader
ii kopete 3.2.1-1debug1 Instant messenger program
ii libqt3c102-mt 3.2.3-2debug1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime version)
1° Knode works flawlessly with the debug packages... Why, oh why...
2° Now I have ugly grey bars between my icons on the taskbar. They are not
even perfectly aligned with the icons. And how can I downgrade kdelibs
without risking destroying my whole KDE install.
3° Ksnapshot is now broken (it reports "bus error") so I cannot attach a
screenshot about the problem 2°.
--
Nicolas DEGAND
Reply to: