Bug#224586: marked as done (kopete creates a directory under /usr/bin)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:12:32 +0200
with message-id <20040310181232.GA15010@kos.to>
and subject line also fixed in kde 3.2 kopete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 11:23:55 +0000
>From data@reypastor.hispalinux.es Sat Dec 20 05:23:55 2003
Return-path: <data@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
Received: from (reypastor.hispalinux.es) [213.229.161.44]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXf8F-0000Q4-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 05:18:51 -0600
Received: by reypastor.hispalinux.es (Postfix, from userid 1019)
id 25DA51E14F9; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:18:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:18:50 +0100
From: Jesus Climent <jesus.climent@hispalinux.es>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kopete creates a directory under /usr/bin
Message-ID: <20031220111850.GA22880@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kopete
Version: N/A; reported 2003-12-20
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1
The package creates a directory under /usr/bin
/kconf_update_bin
containing a binary.
If the binary is not intended to be used by the uses, should go to
/usr/lib/kopete.
If it is used by users, should go to /usr/bin.
Thanks
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux reypastor 2.4.23 #1 lun dic 1 23:39:36 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.23|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
It's a soldier's duty. You wouldn't understand.
--The Colonel (Akira)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224586-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 18:12:35 +0000
>From nchip@kos.to Wed Mar 10 10:12:35 2004
Return-path: <nchip@kos.to>
Received: from xdsl-177-5.nblnetworks.fi (watergate.kos.to) [217.30.177.5] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B18C3-0000B4-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:12:35 -0800
Received: from nchip by watergate.kos.to with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1B18C1-0003uO-2Q
for 224586-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:12:33 +0200
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:12:32 +0200
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
To: 224586-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: also fixed in kde 3.2 kopete
Message-ID: <20040310181232.GA15010@kos.to>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-message-flag: Warning: message not sent with a DRM-Certified client
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Riku Voipio <nchip@kos.to>
Delivered-To: 224586-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
The kconf_update_bin dir has been moved to /usr/lib
--
Riku Voipio | riku.voipio@iki.fi |
kirkkonummentie 33 | +358 40 8476974 --+--
02140 Espoo | |
dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver |
Reply to: