[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qt - c102 still needed ?



On Aug 31, 2003 at 11:36, Ralf Nolden praised the llamas by saying:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi,
> 
> one thing I forgot in my last mail - is the c102 stings in the packages still 
> required or is the gcc transition over so those can be removed safely now and 
> go back to the original package names ?
> 
AIUI it will be needed until the soname is changed, i.e. Qt 4.0


-- 
David Pashley
david@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.

Attachment: pgpBxwMrF0euV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: