Re: DEP-2: Debian Package Maintenance Hub
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that one thing that is missing is integration with VCS-based
> maintenance. In that context, replacing PET would be a worthwhile goal
I agree but I put this in the interesting extensions that we can build on
top of it once we have it.
It's the main reason why I have added "that will help packaging teams to
organize themselves" in the rationale. :-)
Another thing that I just thought of, is that it should replace WNPP for
the management of RFH/RFA/O bugs at least.
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/