Bug#565499: qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable

To: bugs@debian.org
Subject: Bug#565499: qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable
From: Michael Tautschnig <mt@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:46:46 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100116124646.GC423@l04.thnet>
Reply-to: Michael Tautschnig <mt@debian.org>, 565499@bugs.debian.org

Package: qa.debian.org

On http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mt&comaint=yes for some reason
version 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 (which is only in the archive for hurd, all other archs
have 2.16.1-4 at least) is claimed to be the version in unstable, with all the
consequences (DEHS/watch warning, excuses links, ...). I have no idea how this
could possibly happen.

Best,
Michael

Attachment: pgpEBmBpV1Amk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#565499: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#565499: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#565499: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#565499: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Bug#565288: marked as done (DEHS: fbcat is ignored despite watch file present in source package)
Next by Date: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect
Previous by thread: Bug#565288: marked as done (DEHS: fbcat is ignored despite watch file present in source package)
Next by thread: Bug#565499: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread