Re: The PTS should list Ubuntu patches
* Santiago Vila (firstname.lastname@example.org) [050720 12:45]:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog (email@example.com) [050720 00:26]:
> > > Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 11:46 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > > > Why are changes made by one particular derived debian distribution so
> > > > important that they should be singled out by the PTS?
> > > Because they're doing a good job and because those changes are done by
> > > DD ... and because the interest of both parties is to integrate their
> > > changes when it makes sense.
> > well, but these patches should go into the debian BTS then. [...]
> No, just because there is an Ubuntu patch does not mean the patch
> should be in the BTS (there may be other reasons, but the mere
> existence of an Ubuntu patch should not be the only one).
> It should not be a bug to do things differently than Ubuntu.
Agreed. But - when they are just done differently, there is no reason to
listen them in the PTS. If they are valuable and should be picked up,
they should be in BTS.