Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
Michael Stone <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:46:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> The whole discussion is about defining what is reasonable, what are the
>> limits and how can it be made working.
> No, you're looking to set up a special infrastructure to support some
> wacky corner cases. Why don't you just accept the patches for dvidvi and
> upload them?
Having gone through the exercise earlier today of looking at the orphaned
packages for ones that have patches in the BTS, I have to say that the QA
team is doing an excellent job of keeping them clean. I did find a few
that met my fairly restrictive criteria and that I'm now looking at doing
something with, but for the most part there are either minor AMD64 patches
or no patches at all in the BTS.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>