Re: Let's remove netjuke
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:19:16PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Andrew Pollock <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004-11-07 18:45]:
> > > I think netjuke needs some serious love, or it should probably be removed
> > > from the archive.
> > >
> > > Judging from the calibre of the bugs open against it, it is fairly
> > > non-functional out of the box at present, and it's been orphaned for 2
> > > months, and seriously neglected for about 18 months prior to that, and has
> > > one RC bug open at present.
> > Jeroen, what do you think?
> I'd say let it linger in wnpp for a bit more, it isn't there very long,
> and only a month ago became O: again -- someone showed interest in
> keeping it for Debian (though he doesn't want to do it himself).
> Since it's not in testing, it only eats a little bit of diskspace on the
> IMHO, before removing a package, we should give potential adopters the
> chance to see it and pick it up.
It's lingered a bit longer...
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten!