[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#169849: marked as done (elm-me+: STRING PANIC: Index out of array)



Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:17:14 -0500
with message-id <E18IZac-0008JZ-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#169849: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2002 04:59:51 +0000
>From joe@nahmias.net Tue Nov 19 22:59:50 2002
Return-path: <joe@nahmias.net>
Received: from user-0ccerf2.cable.mindspring.com (a750.nahmias.net) [24.199.109.226] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18EMxq-0005bK-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:59:50 -0600
Received: by a750.nahmias.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AA6B1E80C; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:09:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Joe Nahmias <joe@nahmias.net>
Subject: elm-me+: STRING PANIC: Index out of array
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <20021120050937.AA6B1E80C@a750.nahmias.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:09:37 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-3
Severity: normal

I was trying to send a mail from elm, and got the following error message:
----------
                        STRING PANIC: Index out of array
STRING PANIC in cs_binary.c:1043:cs_give_unicode_from_ascii
>>>Index out of array

Emergency exit taken! All temp files intact!
------------

This bug is reproducible by doing the following:
1) Compose a new message ('m' from the main screen).
2) Give it any destination address and subject.
3) After editing the message, you will be at the "Mail Pre-Send Screen".
4) Press 'h' to go to the "Message Header Edit Screen".
5) Type 'i' to edit the "I)n-reply-to:" header.
6) Finally, press the '?' key [Shift-/] and then [enter].
6a) Or, for variety, try pressing the space bar and then [enter].
7) Watch elm crash with the above message. :-(

Also, I've noticed that whatever I type in for this header is discarded...


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux a750.nahmias.net 2.4.19 #1 Sat Oct 19 23:55:05 EDT 2002 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  libc6          2.2.5-14.3     GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libncurses5    5.2.20020112a- Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii  libssl0.9.6    0.9.6g-6       SSL shared libraries
exim	Not installed or no info
ri  postfix        1.1.11.0-3     A high-performance mail transport agent
	^^^ (Provides virtual package mail-transport-agent)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169849-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 19:23:22 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sun Dec 01 13:23:21 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18IZgX-00045z-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 13:23:21 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18IZac-0008JZ-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:17:14 -0500
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 169849-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#169849: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99f-1
Message-Id: <E18IZac-0008JZ-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:17:14 -0500
Delivered-To: 169849-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 169849@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  1 Dec 2002 14:10:35 +0100
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99f-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description: 
 elm-me+    - MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 169849
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+99f-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream release:
     - Fixes In-reply-to handling.  Closes: #169849.
Files: 
 fe1ae2143256c8e9cde8c2a3f70c806d 631 mail optional elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc
 b97294f6ec88e35626f519a7ac38ace1 1251942 mail optional elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz
 f4f6e76bd602ddf37fa34101966b305d 16769 mail optional elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz
 8fd20a900bc0b6ad509f7998d19acef6 785748 mail optional elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96gsGxBYivKllgY8RAs10AKCdI+X3PZtBPM7UC7KI2+teE/waxACg6Qei
+RMOLN0W83cd/KaQFXDG5yM=
=b0Fv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: