Re: ITP->RFP

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org> writes:

> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?

I would propose the two-stage method in use for ITAs:

For each apparently stale ITP:

  1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA question "Do
     you really still intend to upload this?" and there has been no
     response for thirty days, then either convert it to RFP or close
     it, depending on the history.
  2) If the last thing that happened is not a QA question, then send
     the question.