Re: pygtk transition
Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> Do I need to understand this? Currently I do not ...
It's the 3rd mail on this list about this list about this. The package
renaming was discuted last week, I've just sent this mail to say that
the new packages are available.
> If you rename packages and dependent packages, then at least notify
> the package maintainers (and the list) what needs to be done on which
> packages. Which packages become unbuildable/uninstallabe and have to
> be changed?
I've filled bug all concerned packages and I'll let some days to
maintainer before posting a resume a resume of which package need to be
rebuilded.
The old packages are not removed yet, so there is no breakage for the
moment.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
>
> Thanks, Matthias
>
--
Test signature
Reply to: