Re: Fund raising advertisement on the DPN
- To: debian-publicity@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Fund raising advertisement on the DPN
- From: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <alexander@schmehl.info>
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:37:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4EB1558D.1000806@schmehl.info>
- In-reply-to: <20111010183656.GC24278@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>
- References: <E1RBvmc-0000uh-6b@vasks.debian.org> <4E8E2AA9.6000605@debian.org> <20111007063011.GJ10278@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <4E8F50C9.4010608@gmail.com> <20111009201419.GW20466@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <j6v5j7$adf$1@dough.gmane.org> <20111010183656.GC24278@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>
Hi!
Am 10.10.2011 20:36, schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
>> We (the Debian Project, I guess) must not do such thing: there are many
>> ways to achieve freeness, and you didn't choose one the Debian project
>> endorse for itself.
> I don't think the Debian project endorses anything on the matter. The
> Debian project is concerned about the result, not about how the free
> work has been funded.
I agree with Raphael here. Debian informs (as said previously) neutral
and objective about what's going on in the Debian universe. Apparently
there is demand for Debian books - I got often enough asked for
recommendations¹. Apparently someone is trying to fill that gap.
Apparently Debian's users are also interested in that initiative. So
yes, I think Debian should inform our users.
Okay, let's try it that way: Do you, David, could think of a
formulation, that you would find acceptable for the DPN?
Best regards,
Alexander
1: By the way: Did you know that at one point, we also had a collection
of several (German) Debian books for events (got them for the publishers
for free); if visitors asked for books, we showed them the ones the ones
we had. So the visitors could take a look at them, and buy the one,
they found most useful for them. I think it was good to do so; most of
the visitors would have bought a book anyway; through this service they
just had the chance to buy the "right" book for them.
Reply to: