Re: New policy is not consensual
thank you for your answer.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Fernando C. Estrada wrote:
> The DPN issue is not sent yet,
Yeah, and this policy decision should not be tied to the schedule
of this DPN issue. It's fine to drop the suggested entry for now until we
come to a consensus (or a clearer decision).
> Alexander are members of the team, but the opinion is equally divided
> (Francesca, David and me), so for my part I pledge to accept and respect
> the decision taken by other members of the team (Alexander
> Reichle-Schmehl, Meike Reichle, Paul Wise, etc.).
> If at the end is not reached a clear decision, I believe should be the
> main editor (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl) who show us the way forward in
> relation with fund raising initiatives.
> Do you agree with this?
Yes. I hope that the input of the remaining members will help to build a
consensus. And if not I respect Alexander's authority to take a decision
on the matter.
BTW you have not expressed any opinion on the more neutral entry that
I suggested in
Would it be more acceptable than the initial proposal or does that
make no difference to you?
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer