Hi, On Montag, 21. Februar 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > While it's true that we can't support them, it's a bit of a stretch to say > it's risky to run when in fact it's needed to run your computer... whether it's needed or not, it's still (more) risky (than running software where the source is known). Why should it be less risky, just because its needed? cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.