[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Possible one day delay (Was: Debian Project News 2010/14 frozen)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Le 16/10/2010 23:31, David Prévot a écrit :
> Le 15/10/2010 16:57, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :

>> We just finished the last bits for the latest issue of the Debian
>> Project News to be release on Monday.
> 
> The 5th article (“General resolution about Debian project membership”)
> mention that the “resolution is currently being voted on”. Actually, the
> vote will end Monday night, so if the DPN is delayed by a few hours we
> could make this article up to date:
> 
> 	s/is currently being/has just been/
> 
> if the resolution passes:
> 	s/If it passes it would invite/Since it passed, it invites/ ;
> if Further discussion:
> 	replace the “If it passes [...] full voting rights” sentence by
> 	something else, I may propose something tomorrow if no one
> 	objects the delaying proposition.

The complete sentence:
	If it passes it would invite Debian's Account Managers to
	establish procedures to evaluate and accept non-packaging
	contributors to the project including full voting rights.
could be changed, if the resolution passes, to:
	Since it passed, it invites Debian's Account Managers to
	establish procedures to evaluate and accept non-packaging
	contributors to the project including full voting rights.
and if it doesn't, to:
	Since it didn't pass, further discussion may lead to another
	wording in order to consider non-packaging contributors as part
	of the project.

> Since the DPN is usually posted around noon in English, it could just be
> a 12 hours delay if Alexander manage to post it at night, and since the
> translations won't be posted until Wednesday anyway, they would be
> obsolete even before being posted.

Cheers

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAky7iYIACgkQ18/WetbTC/o50ACgkT4iDhLrDnTvNRZz6A4ni47q
CDEAn1MguYVWyRCaIlm4hwCBNdoh4NAg
=WuSh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: