[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Corrections



--- index.wml   2010-06-13 19:53:30.128000005 +0300
+++ index_corr.wml      2010-06-13 20:27:34.856000003 +0300
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 Debian community. Topics covered in this issue include:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#1">Debian Community Poll</a></li>
- <li><a href="#2">Automatic installation of hardware specific packages</a></li> + <li><a href="#2">Automatic installation of hardware-specific packages</a></li> <li><a href="#3">Desktop artwork and themes for Debian <q>Squeeze</q></a></li>
<li><a href="#4">Debian Installer string freeze coming up</a></li>
<li><a href="#5">Provisional list of talks for DebConf10</a></li>
@@ -96,13 +96,13 @@


<a name="2"></a>
-<h2>Automatic installation of hardware specific packages</h2>
+<h2>Automatic installation of hardware-specific packages</h2>

<p>Petter Reinholdtsen introduced a new change into the Debian installation
 system allowing the installation of <a
 href="http://lists.debian.org/2fly6f0ypze.fsf@login2.uio.no";>hardware
 specific packages</a> at installation time (or on an already installed
-system).  This is useful for certain RAID controllers, graphic adaptors and
+system).  This is useful for certain RAID controllers, graphic adapters and
other hardware, and is done by mapping PCI and USB IDs to the names of Debian
 packages.  Petter welcomes help maintaining this list.</p>

@@ -167,9 +167,9 @@

<p>While working on requests to add specific license texts to
<tt>/usr/share/common-licenses/</tt>, Russ Allbery wrote a script to check
-which license are used how often in the Debian archive. He also published <a +which licenses are used and how often in the Debian archive. He also published <a
 href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2010/06/msg00099.html";>his
-results</a>. Not surprising: the most used licenses are the different forms and +results</a>. Unsurprinsingly, the most used licenses are the different forms and
 versions of the GNU General Public License.</p>


@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
of packaging</a> once upstream development created a release that actually has
 merit.</p>

-<p>Bastian Blank wondered, whether Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> should be shipped +<p>Bastian Blank wondered whether Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> should be shipped <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/06/msg00220.html";>Xen 3.4 or
 4.0</a> and listed some pros and cons for both versions.</p>


Reply to: