Hi! Am 30.05.2010 00:06, schrieb David Prévot: > I think by removing the "lilo" package, the goal is really to get rid of > "LILO", but your remark let me think that it isn't as obvious as I > initially thought. Thanks for bringing the matter up. I think the current state (with the text "LILO" linking to the webpage of the "lilo" package) is quite good. Best regards, Alexander