On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 05:29:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >What happened to Debian Social Contract #3: "We will not hide problems"? > >I was aware that this blog post would not help to improve Debian's >image. And I care a lot about Debian's image. But I care even more about >Debian's health, and I think that this problem is hurting Debian at a >much deeper level than PR, and has been doing so for a long time. > >I think that we (DDs) should all feel ashamed that we have not been able >to find a solution to this. It looks a bit selfish: once you are a DD, >you don't have to care about DAM anymore (except when your key expires). > >Anyway, when this problem will be fixed (not just worked-around or >postponed), I will very happily blog about it, and try to help reach a >wider audience than my blog post did. Lucas, whingeing and complaining in public about this stuff just before I get a chance to do anything about it is *really* nice timing from you. Thanks for that... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature