Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > That's basically it, yes. Everything else is essentially ancillary stuff > like governing law, that either part can break out of it, no warranties, > how to dispute the traffic report if we want to, etc. The most important > part of the information is the string we will use to identify Debian > traffic (see Joey's point). In any case, the draft agreement is > available in the DPL home on master, under agreements/, as usual. (Only > there and not as an attachment simply because I haven't yet explicitly > asked if I can shared it publicly, but I doubt there will be a problem > with that.) AFAICS, section 5 of its Terms requires that the document be treated confidentially. Anther interesting thing in there is a requirement that we inform DDG thirty days in advance of releasing changes to the implementation of the links to it. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature