Philip Hands wrote at 2012-03-27 04:46 -0500: > On the other hand, I suppose there's some tiny chance that Google will > be offended, and reduce sponsorship of DebConf, or be less willing to > give us GSoC projects, say. If we were being mercenary one might want > to compare how much money we're likely to get from DDG with the > potential loss from Google, but as you say, this should be a technical > decision, so if Google get upset about it, that's not really something > to be taken into account. This might be a good reason to go with the 25% option, making DuckDuckGo an option but not the default. Or a user could be required to choose the default search engine when creating a new profile.
Description: Digital signature