On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:26:09 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > So, to turn this into something even more useful: is there anyone > willing to keep an eye on the CC process on behalf of Debian? > > The ideal candidate should be a license geek in agreement with the > current position of the Debian Project on which licenses are DFSG-free > and which are not. We would all love if such a person will take care of > reporting what is going on in the CC process, looking from a Debian > angle, on a regular basis. I subscribed to the cc-licenses mailing list and I will try to participate in the CC-v4.0 drafting process. However, I am *not* the ideal candidate that you describe, since I *disagree* with ftp-masters on how CC-v3.0 licenses should be considered (as many people on debian-legal and elsewhere are aware, I am convinced that even CC-by-v3.0 and CC-by-sa-v3.0 licenses *fail* to meet the DFSG). As a consequence, I will speak for myself only. I will try to explicitly clarify that I don't speak on behalf of the Debian Project, whenever I feel that confusion may arise. > > Thanks for the heads up, Paul! Indeed. Thanks a lot to Paul for notifying us! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpRSXiEo8Tq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature