Re: FTPMaster meeting minutes
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Joerg Jaspert <email@example.com> wrote:
> 9. dak rm
> Alexander helped our removal tool to gain a new option. From now on
> we can close bugs associated to a package when doing a sourceful
> removal. Obviously this is not enabled by default, but an option we
> have to select whenever appropriate (not all removals mean all bugs
> can be closed, like when its "just" a source rename), but this can
> greatly help the QA team.
Will you also do the converse? unarchive and reopen appropriate bugs
(based on the version tree) when a source package is reintroduced into
the archive? Often a package gets orphaned and people who are
interested in it don't notice until it gets removed from the archive
and they then work on getting it re-uploaded.
> 21. untag pending bugs if a package is rejected
> As the bugs fixed in packages in the NEW queue are currently
> (semi-) automatically taged "pending", Jan Hauke Rahm suggested to
> untag them, if a package get's rejected from NEW. There's already
> a patch floating arround, which needs to be reviewed and merged.
I assume you will also take over automatically adding pending tags to
packages in NEW?