On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 05:39:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:55PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > We need the redistribution bit, I don't think we need it to be allowed > > > to be used by all users. Non-commercial is fine in non-free, or at > > > least was, last time I checked. > > > I wouldn't be surprised if our requirements have increased even in that > > regard in recent years. > > > At least nowadays I mostly expect stuff that has weird licenses about > > modification and following redistribution in non-free. I hardly expect > > stuff that one is not even allowed to use. But maybe that's just me. :) > > I think that's just you. There has been no decision by the project to > change the license requirements for non-free, and if the ftp masters have > decided this, they haven't disclosed it anywhere appropriate. Indeed, last time I checked, the requirement was that Debian is allowed to redistribute the stuff, which kind of makes sense ;) -- Intersec <http://www.intersec.com> Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@intersec.com> Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346 Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131 Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332 37 Rue Pierre Lhomme 92400 Courbevoie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature