Re: On cadence and collaboration
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Discussing the validity of security policies is not the point of this
> thread, so let's leave it at that, please.
It is exactly the point of this thread if you use it as an argument
against a common freeze cycle.
> This was only an example, there are others, nitpicking
> on this one (or any other, for that matter) is pointless.
It's OK to bring it up as an argument, but not to counter it?
Counter-argument != nitpicking. I wholeheartedly agree there are other
examples, pro and con, but since you brought this up as an argument,
there's nothing pointless in countering it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
Reply to: