Le mercredi 05 août 2009 à 20:25 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth a écrit : > At the micro-level, across the long tail of thousands of packages, I > don't expect there to be detailed coordination through a process like > this. The main benefit would come from the smaller set of core > infrastructure packages that generate a lot of bugs and maintenance > issues. Things like: > > - Python - 2.6, 2.7, 3.2? > Now, that's not a large percentage of the archive, but they are all > things that have a lot of consequences, and differences there drive a > lot of other packaging differences (especially things like Python). If you want your examples to be meaningful, please don’t invoke cases where a Canonical employee is specifically holding back development in Debian. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=