Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:04:56 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4A7734D8.2090805@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnh7e7l7.bs0.jmm@inutil.org>
- References: <20090729010802.GA29421@melusine.alphascorpii.net> <20090730064541.GE29901@foghorn.stateful.de> <20090730071626.GC2911@torres.zugschlus.de> <20090730083746.GA11171@rivendell> <857993970907300159x407bc541w84b40926ff47b5dd@mail.gmail.com> <h4rofd$ptl$1@ger.gmane.org> <857993970907300236j3e943d01ned91b69c466704fe@mail.gmail.com> <87ocr2fmq9.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87skgeickp.fsf@iki.fi> <[🔎] slrnh7e7l7.bs0.jmm@inutil.org>
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2009-07-30, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> wrote:
>> On 2009-07-30 13:12 (+0200), Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-07-30 11:36 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>>> Oh, and Debian got hundreds of active developers, and I doubt they'll
>>>> be running to Shuttleworth anytime soon.
>>> Probably not, but the release synchronization with Ubuntu may make
>>> them feel that they are working for him, which can be a great
>>> demotivation.
>> That's why it would be interesting to hear some concrete ideas how
>> useful this would be for the parties. How pros and cons balance? I'll
>> start:
>
> Aligning our releases with RHEL rather than with Ubuntu seems more
> worthwhile to me. They have similar stabilisation lengths as we did
> for previous releases and they're investing a lot of work into the
> kernel, from which we could profit immensely.
Ack. Or at least Fedora.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: