Hello, On ketvirtadienis 30 Liepa 2009 13:49:42 Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > After one day and more of flaming about the subject, may I summarize - with > my John Doe Debian Developer hat on - what it seems a few points catched > and ask RMs about their thoughts on them? I woud prefer the project did a > little step forward instead of flaming and complaining only. > > - A freeze every two years could be viable/appropriate to many, or at > least it seems so. This is basically not so different from the current > 'unofficial' policy. > - A freeze in December for squeeze is probably too early for many teams. > Maybe next spring/summer is more appropriate and acceptable? > - A so long support and roadmap for squeeze and squeeze+1 is probably > not justifiable/difficult to support/what else... > - Next time, any team that would take a decision which impacts > the whole project have to be fair and consult the project as a whole, > before unilateral actions. That's appropriate even if the team is > acting within its own limits of decision making, as in this case. > This appears as responsible and appropriate to the most. This is > a general recommendation and does not require comments, probably. > > Folks, be pragmatic and do required steps to find a common shared idea. +1 to all points. Very well summarized my POV. -- Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.