On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:19:38AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the correct approach to that problem: It > doesn't take in account maintainers that are not DDs, and that can > also become MIA. But it could be used in addition to other > approaches. Fair enough, that's actually a good argument for not getting rid of the current MIA process, but rather keep on using it for non DD maintainers. Still, as you observe, it doesn't seem to be against this precise proposal. .oO( it also made me wonder that the proposal should probably be extended to DMs, of course only counting uploads cause they currently have no voting rights ) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature